Everything in manufacturing is intentional, from the machines utilized to the processes and operations in production— and material is no exception. Medical device producers around the world use a variety of materials, but metals, polymers, and ceramic are the most popular materials for orthopedic implant manufacturing. When manufacturers decide upon what type of implant they want to produce, they first assess its intended purpose and verify that it will meet the patient’s needs. After making this determination, material selection follows suit. The type of implant needed is always directly correlated with the material used.
But looking beyond the active use of the implant, medical device producers have another factor to consider: manufacturability. Manufacturability refers to the ease of production and handling of an object or product. The term can apply to a wide variety of factors, from material content to simple functionality. There are several considerations that must be examined when determining whether a product is manufacturable in terms of both design and cost.
One of the most significant benefits of polymer components is that they help manufacturers produce excellent surface finishes during the molding process. This leads to superior optical properties when compared with metal parts cast onto a polymer substrate.
Manufacturing polymer orthopedic implants has a number of benefits, but this material also comes with its own set of unique limitations.
Pros
Cons
Perhaps the most common material for orthopedic implant production, metals are significantly more durable than plastics. Metals can tolerate more intense external forces than plastics can. At high temperatures where plastic would begin to melt, the metal stays strong. Metals are great thermal and electrical conductors and are typically easier to clean than plastics.
Manufacturers typically use Titanium and Stainless steel due to their unmatched strength-to-weight ratio compared to other metals, however promising developments in new alloys are now allowing manufacturers to tailor material characteristics even further to suit the application’s needs.
Like polymers, selecting metals as your orthopedic implant material of choice also has its own unique advantages and disadvantages.
Pros
Cons
Materials such as ceramics, while possessing desirable properties such as hardness, high temperature tolerance, and chemical resistance, also suffer from limitations such as limited design flexibility, lower strength, and brittle performance. For any given application, it may be necessary to combine ceramics with other materials such as titanium or polyethylene acetabular cups to provide optimal performance.
Ceramics have their own respective manufacturability pros and cons:
Pros
Cons
The current trend in orthopedic implants is moving toward more polymeric devices, but this does not mean that polymers are the perfect material. Even though they are biocompatible and often inexpensive, the material characteristics of polymers can be less than ideal. To compensate for their shortcomings, engineers frequently design implants that combine a metallic element with a polymer coating to improve performance.
It has been suggested that metals used in combination with biocompatible polymers exhibit better longevity of materials due to their superior properties over other materials used for implants. Metal-polymer composite implants typically have improved mechanical properties when compared with their pure metal counterparts. Polymers can act as insulation or lubrication, which improves the mechanical properties and reduces the risk of implant failure.
Metal-polymer composites are more expensive than simple metal components due to additional processing steps required during manufacturing. These steps can include secondary operations such as coating and finishing, which may increase costs, but produces a superior implant in biocompatibility and wear resistance. Composite materials also typically exhibit lower thermal conductivity than their pure metal counterparts, thus increasing the temperature resistance.
An implant’s design features and desired performance characteristics must be factored in when assessing the device’s manufacturability. Overall, manufacturers need to balance these tradeoffs with the available manufacturing capabilities during the design stage to produce an implant that will serve users’ needs.
The simplest way to balance manufacturability and design is by using a material that allows for minimal machining, has excellent mechanical properties, demonstrates both strength and flexibility, and enables complex geometries. At Micron, we apply decades of orthopedic implant manufacturing experience to help you make the right choice for your production needs. Our ISO 13485:2016 Certified, FDA Registered facility provides cutting-edge manufacturing services optimized for quality, cost, and efficiency.
Get in touch with Micron’s engineers today to learn how we can improve your orthopedic implant manufacturing operations.